FW: Transport_map as second MX server

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FW: Transport_map as second MX server

Paul Cocker
Annnnnnnnnd it's dealt with further down the page.

My apologies for crying wolf a little too quickly.


Paul Cocker

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Cocker
Sent: 05 September 2008 12:37
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Transport_map as second MX server

I'm running through the e-mail gateway example at postfix.org as this
appears to be what I'm looking for, a setup which passes e-mail on for
valid domains.

It talks about using transport_map and defining the inside smtp
gateway... My knowledge on proper handling of this is pretty dicey but
as I understand it the second, third, fourth MX servers etc. should pass
e-mail to the first MX server which then relays it to the internal mail
servers.

Assuming this is correct, should I be defining this setting at all?

Paul Cocker





TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897),TNT Post North Ltd (05701709) and TNT Post South West Ltd (05983401). Emma's Diary and Lifecycle are trading names for Lifecycle Marketing (Mother and Baby) Ltd (02556692). All companies are registered in England and Wales; registered address: 1 Globeside Business Park, Fieldhouse Lane, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 1HY.