回覆: Re: no route to host

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

回覆: Re: no route to host

LittleCho-2
Hi there,

   Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.

Michael J Wise <[hidden email]>提到:

>
>On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
>
>> Hello, sorry for sending too  many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
>
>220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
>
>Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
>
>Aloha,
>Michael.
>--
>"Please have your Internet License            
> and Usenet Registration handy..."
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Engin qwert
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server: 195.175.39.39
Address: 195.175.39.39#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.167
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.183
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.135
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.151


> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800

> Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host
> From: [hidden email]
> To: postf [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.
>
> Michael J Wise <[hidden email]>提到:
>
> >
> >On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
> >
> >220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
> >
> >Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
> >
> > Aloha,
> >Michael.
> >--
> >"Please have your Internet License
> > and Usenet Registration handy..."
> >
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Paul Enlund-2
What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


On 29/07/2012 23:47, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server: 195.175.39.39
Address: 195.175.39.39#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.167
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.183
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.135
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.151


> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host
> From: [hidden email]
> To: postf [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.
>
> Michael J Wise [hidden email]提到:
>
> >
> >On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
> >
> >220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
> >
> >Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
> >
> > Aloha,
> >Michael.
> >--
> >"Please have your Internet License
> > and Usenet Registration handy..."
> >

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Engin qwert
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


On 29/07/2012 23:47, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server: 195.175.39.39
Address: 195.175.39.39#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.167
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.183
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.135
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.151


> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host
> From: [hidden email]
> To: postf [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.
>
> Michael J Wise [hidden email]提到:
>
> >
> >On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
> >
> >220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
> >
> >Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
> >
> > Aloha,
> >Michael.
> >--
> >"Please have your Internet License
> > and Usenet Registration handy..."
> >

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Paul Enlund-2
And now

traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2

and

traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2



On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


On 29/07/2012 23:47, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server: 195.175.39.39
Address: 195.175.39.39#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.167
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.183
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.135
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.151


> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host
> From: [hidden email]
> To: postf [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.
>
> Michael J Wise [hidden email]提 到:
>
> >
> >On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
> >
> >220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
> >
> >Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
> >
> > Aloha,
> >Michael.
> >--
> >"Please have your Internet License
> > and Usenet Registration handy..."
> >


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Engin qwert
The first command is

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  7.955 ms  7.939 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  169.972 ms  169.801 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * spike.porcupine.org (168.100.189.2)  215.049 ms

and the second one is;

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  46.527 ms  46.515 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  165.982 ms  165.815 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *



Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:03:25 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

And now

traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2

and

traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2



On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


On 29/07/2012 23:47, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server: 195.175.39.39
Address: 195.175.39.39#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.167
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.183
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.135
Name: hotmail.com
Address: 65.55.72.151


> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host
> From: [hidden email]
> To: postf [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>
> Hi there,
>
> Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please check the settings in your transport mappings.
>
> Michael J Wise [hidden email]提 到:
>
> >
> >On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
> >
> >220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel (ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
> >
> >Well, it does appear to be reachable from the outside world, so THAT's good….
> >
> > Aloha,
> >Michael.
> >--
> >"Please have your Internet License
> > and Usenet Registration handy..."
> >


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Paul Enlund-2
In my opinion TCP port 25 (smtp) is being blocked by either
your router or the upstream provider
On 30/07/2012 00:06, Engin qwert wrote:
The first command is

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  7.955 ms  7.939 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  169.972 ms  169.801 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * spike.porcupine.org (168.100.189.2)  215.049 ms

and the second one is;

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  46.527 ms  46.515 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  165.982 ms  165.815 ms
 7  * * *

On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Stef Caunter
It seems you are on a home internet line with outbound 25 blocked except to your isp mail gateways.
BlackBerry PIN 280C6BCD +1 647 459 9475

From: Paul Enlund <[hidden email]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

In my opinion TCP port 25 (smtp) is being blocked by either
your router or the upstream provider
On 30/07/2012 00:06, Engin qwert wrote:
The first command is

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  7.955 ms  7.939 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  169.972 ms  169.801 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * spike.porcupine.org (168.100.189.2)  215.049 ms

and the second one is;

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  46.527 ms  46.515 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  165.982 ms  165.815 ms
 7  * * *

On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

Engin qwert
In reply to this post by Paul Enlund-2
My router don't even have any configuration interface it is hard to be blocked from router. In this situation the upstream provider may be. But I want to repeat again that. Before making a clean install, I could send mail from outside the server. For example. 

Client(Icedove program pointing to server) > Mail Server > The mail sent.

but ;

Mail Server (Icedove program pointing to itself) > Cannot send mail (the error message were "no route to the host")


Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

In my opinion TCP port 25 (smtp) is being blocked by either
your router or the upstream provider
On 30/07/2012 00:06, Engin qwert wrote:
The first command is

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  7.955 ms  7.939 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  169.972 ms  169.801 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * spike.porcupine.org (168.100.189.2)  215.049 ms

and the second one is;

root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  46.527 ms  46.515 ms *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 204.8.103.178 (204.8.103.178)  165.982 ms  165.815 ms
 7  * * *

On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 
traceroute to 168.100.189.2 (168.100.189.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.138.9.254 (10.138.9.254)  39.993 ms !X * *



Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

What is the output from the command

 traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: no route to host

Reindl Harald-2
a mail-client is usually configured to use port 587 (submissionn)
and not 25 (smtp) becuase 25 is for server-to-server communication
and blocking port 25 outgoing from home-users is a good weapon
to block their spam-bots

Am 30.07.2012 01:22, schrieb Engin qwert:

> My router don't even have any configuration interface it is hard to be blocked from router. In this situation the
> upstream provider may be. But I want to repeat again that. Before making a clean install, I could send mail from
> outside the server. For example.
>
> Client(Icedove program pointing to server) > Mail Server > The mail sent.
>
> but ;
>
> Mail Server (Icedove program pointing to itself) > Cannot send mail (the error message were "no route to the host")
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100
> From: [hidden email]
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host
>
> In my opinion TCP port 25 (smtp) is being blocked by either
> your router or the upstream provider


signature.asc (270 bytes) Download Attachment