So ein Tag…

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

So ein Tag…

Martin Steigerwald
… an dem ich in meine sender_checks einfach nur ein

/.*/ REJECT Leave me alone already

eintragen möchte und mir eine Führerscheinpflicht für das Aufsetzen eines
Mail-Servers wünsche.

Oder dass Postfix sich einfach weigert zu starten, wenn es merkt, dass es
jemand nicht mal fertig bringt, die Domain für den Mailserver richtig zu
konfigurieren.



Besonders Highlight dabei:

  Received: from mail.example.com (unknown [219.142.131.153])
        by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CCB3100CC
        for <[hidden email]>; Sun,  6 May 2018 17:04:58 +0200 (CEST)



 Return-Path: <>
  X-Original-To: [hidden email]
  Delivered-To: [hidden email]
  Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de
  Received: from mail.example.com (unknown [219.142.131.153])
        by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CCB3100CC
        for <[hidden email]>; Sun,  6 May 2018 17:04:58 +0200 (CEST)
  Received: by mail.example.com (Postfix)
        id 0929314956E; Sun,  6 May 2018 23:04:55 +0800 (CST)
  Date: Sun,  6 May 2018 23:04:55 +0800 (CST)
  From: [hidden email] (Mail Delivery System)
  Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
  To: [hidden email]
  Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
        boundary="669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com"
  Message-Id: <[hidden email]>
  X-Spam-Level: *********
  X-Rspamd-Server: mondschein
  X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 58CCB3100CC
  X-Spamd-Result: default: False [9.38 / 15.00]
         ASN(0.00)[asn:4847, ipnet:219.142.128.0/18, country:CN]
         ARC_NA(0.00)[]
         FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]
         MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[text/plain,multipart/signed]
         R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]
         MIME_UNKNOWN(0.10)[message/rfc822]
         DMARC_NA(0.00)[ykye.com]
         BAYES_HAM(-0.84)[85.24%]
         RBL_SPAMHAUS_CSS(2.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.3]
         RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]
         TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]
         GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]
         RBL_SPAMHAUS_XBL(4.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.4]
         RBL_SPAMHAUS_PBL(2.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]
         FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[[hidden email],]
         R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]
         TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]
         RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
         HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[mail.example.com]
         AUTH_NA(1.00)[]
         HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[mail.example.com]
         RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]
         IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: CN(0.07)]
  X-Spam: Yes
 
  This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
 
  --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
  Content-Description: Notification
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
  This is the mail system at host mail.example.com.
 
  I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
  be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
 
  For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
 
  If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
  delete your own text from the attached returned message.
 
                     The mail system
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
      550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
      unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 
  --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
  Content-Description: Delivery report
  Content-Type: message/delivery-status
 
  Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.example.com
  X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 669171493C9
  X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Arrival-Date: Fri,  4 May 2018 16:02:23 +0800 (CST)
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
  Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
  Action: failed
  Status: 5.1.1
  Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
  Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
      address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
 
  --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
  Content-Description: Undelivered Message
  Content-Type: message/rfc822
 
  Received: from [127.0.1.1] (unknown [5.5.5.16])
        by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669171493C9;
        Fri,  4 May 2018 16:02:23 +0800 (CST)
  From: Martin Steigerwald <[hidden email]>
  To: [hidden email]
  Subject: Re: What needs to improve in KDE 4?
  Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:58:42 +0200

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Kein Witz.

  User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33.2-tp42-toi-3.1-lowmem-free-991-992-04964-gf00c7ec-dirty; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; )

Aber cool zu sehen, was damals für ein Kernel aktuell war.

Mittlerweile erstellt KDE solche Header glaub gar nicht mehr und mein
haut die ohnehin raus.

  References: <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> (sfid-20100510_204337_658379_4F4B8310)
  In-Reply-To: <[hidden email]>
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="nextPart13412309.6Ix9itSKnv";
    protocol="application/pgp-signature";
    micalg=pgp-sha1
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  Message-Id: <[hidden email]>
  X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
  X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
  Resent-Message-ID: <dSKosERKl1D.A.jLG.lGI6LB@liszt>
  Resent-From: [hidden email]
  X-Mailing-List: <[hidden email]> archive/latest/32344
  X-Loop: [hidden email]
  List-Id: <debian-kde.lists.debian.org>
  List-Post: <mailto:[hidden email]>
  List-Help: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help>
  List-Subscribe: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=subscribe>
  List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe>
  Precedence: list
  Resent-Sender: [hidden email]
  Resent-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
 
  --nextPart13412309.6Ix9itSKnv
  Content-Type: Text/Plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  Am Montag 10 Mai 2010 schrieb Nate Bargmann:
  > * On 2010 10 May 11:50 -0500, Dotan Cohen wrote:
  > > Yes, 4.2 and now 4.4 seem to behave badly without a clean ~/.kde. I
  > > find that very disturbing and unstable.
 […]
--
Martin


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Aw: So ein Tag…

Infoomatic
Erinnert mich an letzte Woche. Bin vom Urlaub zurückgekommen, mail reputation im Eimer, unsere Mails wurden bei sämtlichen Kommunikationspartnern als Spam markiert.
Grund: in meiner Abwesenheit wurde eine "Spezialfirma für Mailmarketing" beauftragt Newsletter in unserem Namen zu verschicken. Über Mailchimp. Ohne unsere SPF etc. zu checken.
Also kamen die Mails nach einer Weile als Spam an. Die haben sich gedacht "Mist, na dann verwenden wir einfach eine andere Plattform und machens nochmal". Das ganze dann eine Woche später nochmal, also von 3 Plattformen. Kopf->Tisch sag ich da nur. Da muss man durch ;-)

LG,
Robert

> Gesendet: Sonntag, 06. Mai 2018 um 23:13 Uhr
> Von: "Martin Steigerwald" <[hidden email]>
> An: "Diskussionen und Support rund um Postfix" <[hidden email]>
> Betreff: So ein Tag…
>
> … an dem ich in meine sender_checks einfach nur ein
>
> /.*/ REJECT Leave me alone already
>
> eintragen möchte und mir eine Führerscheinpflicht für das Aufsetzen eines
> Mail-Servers wünsche.
>
> Oder dass Postfix sich einfach weigert zu starten, wenn es merkt, dass es
> jemand nicht mal fertig bringt, die Domain für den Mailserver richtig zu
> konfigurieren.
>
>
>
> Besonders Highlight dabei:
>
>   Received: from mail.example.com (unknown [219.142.131.153])
>         by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CCB3100CC
>         for <[hidden email]>; Sun,  6 May 2018 17:04:58 +0200 (CEST)
>
>
>
>  Return-Path: <>
>   X-Original-To: [hidden email]
>   Delivered-To: [hidden email]
>   Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de
>   Received: from mail.example.com (unknown [219.142.131.153])
>         by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CCB3100CC
>         for <[hidden email]>; Sun,  6 May 2018 17:04:58 +0200 (CEST)
>   Received: by mail.example.com (Postfix)
>         id 0929314956E; Sun,  6 May 2018 23:04:55 +0800 (CST)
>   Date: Sun,  6 May 2018 23:04:55 +0800 (CST)
>   From: [hidden email] (Mail Delivery System)
>   Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
>   To: [hidden email]
>   Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
>   MIME-Version: 1.0
>   Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>         boundary="669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com"
>   Message-Id: <[hidden email]>
>   X-Spam-Level: *********
>   X-Rspamd-Server: mondschein
>   X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 58CCB3100CC
>   X-Spamd-Result: default: False [9.38 / 15.00]
>          ASN(0.00)[asn:4847, ipnet:219.142.128.0/18, country:CN]
>          ARC_NA(0.00)[]
>          FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]
>          MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[text/plain,multipart/signed]
>          R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]
>          MIME_UNKNOWN(0.10)[message/rfc822]
>          DMARC_NA(0.00)[ykye.com]
>          BAYES_HAM(-0.84)[85.24%]
>          RBL_SPAMHAUS_CSS(2.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.3]
>          RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]
>          TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]
>          GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]
>          RBL_SPAMHAUS_XBL(4.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.4]
>          RBL_SPAMHAUS_PBL(2.00)[153.131.142.219.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]
>          FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[[hidden email],]
>          R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]
>          TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]
>          RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
>          HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[mail.example.com]
>          AUTH_NA(1.00)[]
>          HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[mail.example.com]
>          RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]
>          IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: CN(0.07)]
>   X-Spam: Yes
>  
>   This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
>  
>   --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
>   Content-Description: Notification
>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>  
>   This is the mail system at host mail.example.com.
>  
>   I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
>   be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>  
>   For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
>  
>   If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
>   delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>  
>                      The mail system
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   <[hidden email]>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
>       550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient address rejected: User
>       unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>  
>   --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
>   Content-Description: Delivery report
>   Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>  
>   Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.example.com
>   X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 669171493C9
>   X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Arrival-Date: Fri,  4 May 2018 16:02:23 +0800 (CST)
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   Final-Recipient: rfc822; [hidden email]
>   Original-Recipient: rfc822;[hidden email]
>   Action: failed
>   Status: 5.1.1
>   Remote-MTA: dns; bendel.debian.org
>   Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <[hidden email]>: Recipient
>       address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>  
>   --669171493C9.1525619095/mail.example.com
>   Content-Description: Undelivered Message
>   Content-Type: message/rfc822
>  
>   Received: from [127.0.1.1] (unknown [5.5.5.16])
>         by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669171493C9;
>         Fri,  4 May 2018 16:02:23 +0800 (CST)
>   From: Martin Steigerwald <[hidden email]>
>   To: [hidden email]
>   Subject: Re: What needs to improve in KDE 4?
>   Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:58:42 +0200
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Kein Witz.
>
>   User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33.2-tp42-toi-3.1-lowmem-free-991-992-04964-gf00c7ec-dirty; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; )
>
> Aber cool zu sehen, was damals für ein Kernel aktuell war.
>
> Mittlerweile erstellt KDE solche Header glaub gar nicht mehr und mein
> haut die ohnehin raus.
>
>   References: <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> (sfid-20100510_204337_658379_4F4B8310)
>   In-Reply-To: <[hidden email]>
>   MIME-Version: 1.0
>   Content-Type: multipart/signed;
>     boundary="nextPart13412309.6Ix9itSKnv";
>     protocol="application/pgp-signature";
>     micalg=pgp-sha1
>   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>   Message-Id: <[hidden email]>
>   X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
>   X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
>   Resent-Message-ID: <dSKosERKl1D.A.jLG.lGI6LB@liszt>
>   Resent-From: [hidden email]
>   X-Mailing-List: <[hidden email]> archive/latest/32344
>   X-Loop: [hidden email]
>   List-Id: <debian-kde.lists.debian.org>
>   List-Post: <mailto:[hidden email]>
>   List-Help: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=help>
>   List-Subscribe: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=subscribe>
>   List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe>
>   Precedence: list
>   Resent-Sender: [hidden email]
>   Resent-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
>  
>   --nextPart13412309.6Ix9itSKnv
>   Content-Type: Text/Plain;
>     charset="iso-8859-1"
>   Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>  
>   Am Montag 10 Mai 2010 schrieb Nate Bargmann:
>   > * On 2010 10 May 11:50 -0500, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>   > > Yes, 4.2 and now 4.4 seem to behave badly without a clean ~/.kde. I
>   > > find that very disturbing and unstable.
>  […]
> --
> Martin
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: So ein Tag…

Martin Steigerwald
Infoomatic - 07.05.18, 19:23:

> Erinnert mich an letzte Woche. Bin vom Urlaub zurückgekommen, mail
> reputation im Eimer, unsere Mails wurden bei sämtlichen
> Kommunikationspartnern als Spam markiert. Grund: in meiner
> Abwesenheit wurde eine "Spezialfirma für Mailmarketing" beauftragt
> Newsletter in unserem Namen zu verschicken. Über Mailchimp. Ohne
> unsere SPF etc. zu checken. Also kamen die Mails nach einer Weile als
> Spam an. Die haben sich gedacht "Mist, na dann verwenden wir einfach
> eine andere Plattform und machens nochmal". Das ganze dann eine Woche
> später nochmal, also von 3 Plattformen. Kopf->Tisch sag ich da nur.
> Da muss man durch ;-)

Besonders ärgerlich ist, dass bereits drei Subscriber der debian-kde-
Mailingliste meinen Computer, wo der Mailclient läuft, oder meinen Mail-
Server für nochmal versendeten Mails verantwortlich machen.

Der Mail-Server schickt das offenbar also auch an andere Listen-
Teilnehmer.

--
Martin