> Is it possible to compile postfix without support for tables based on
> Berkeley's libdb statically linked in? Just like building lmdb support
> into shared lib
> I read through README_FILES/DB_README but did not find advice similar to
> that using AUXLIBS_LMDB (as described in README_FILES/LMDB_README).
> The final goal is to hunk out libdb dependency from base postfix package
> but keep a postfix-bdb package for backward compability during a
> transition period.
> Ciao, Michael.
On 12/10/20 6:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Str?der:
>> Is it possible to compile postfix without support for tables based on
>> Berkeley's libdb statically linked in? Just like building lmdb support
>> into shared lib
> To enable/disable build options:
> $ make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB" ...
Yes, I already saw that. Maybe my wording was not clear enough.
I'd like to build *with* hash and btree tables support. But instead of
linking libdb into "main" postfix binaries I'd like to get a separate
shared lib like
or similar which I'd like to put into a optionally installable